[Prism Labs Validation Studies (Feb 24) - Google Slides](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1m7wTmedne_1sOUNmvWuDMHxb3b-YSeyrJFWxldlw4o4/preview#slide=id.g1bbd75ae9a7_0_20)
| Studies published with Prism tech | Highlights |
|---|---|
| (2024) Precision Validation of Prism Mobile Scanning Tech | • Published in the https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-024-01424-w. |
| • New mobile scanning method as precise as large and expensive multi-camera 3D scanners. | |
| (2023) Precision and Accuracy Validation of Prism Mobile Scanning Tech | • White paper available https://drive.google.com/file/d/18Hs7WaUxeRr3Rm6PQi-UTpHQs6XWWFRz/view?usp=sharing. |
| • Prism’s iPhone scanning tech was found to have superior precision than other systems, and good accuracy to DXA. | |
| (2023) Precision Validation of Single Camera Non-rigid Method | • Published in the https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268523000323. |
| • New method more precise than multi-camera 3D scanners. | |
| (2020) Validation of 3 Commercial Body Scanners vs Prism Gen 1 Scanner | • Published in the https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31685968/. |
| • Precise anthropometric estimates were found. | |
| (2019) Accuracy & Precision of Prism Gen 1 Scanner | • Published in the https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089806/. |
| • Good correlations between tape vs anthropometric measurements and bf% vs DXA were found, with no significant bias. |