See the latest peer-reviewed publications featuring Prism Labs’ technology.
| Studies published with Prism tech | Highlights |
|---|---|
| (2024) Accuracy of Body Measurements Again | • Published in the Obesity Science and Practice. |
| • Body measurements from mobile 3D scanning and ground-truth tape measurements by a trained anthropometrism were highly correlated | |
| (2024) Accuracy Validation of Prism Mobile Scanning Tech Against DXA | • Published in the Frontiers in Medicine. |
| • New mobile phone scanning method is now suitable to be deployed as a rapid and accessible alternative to DXA scans. | |
| (2024) Body composition estimation using US Army method from 3D mobile phone scan | • Published in the British Journal of Nutrition. |
| • Evaluation of the new US Army method for body composition using the Prism body scanning tech was found to have acceptable performance at group-level. | |
| (2024) Precision Validation of Prism Mobile Scanning Tech | • Published in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. |
| • New mobile scanning method as precise as large and expensive multi-camera 3D scanners. | |
| (2023) Precision and Accuracy Validation of Prism Mobile Scanning Tech | • White paper available here. |
| • Prism’s iPhone scanning tech was found to have superior precision than other systems, including BIA, and good body composition accuracy against DXA. | |
| (2023) Precision Validation of Single Camera Non-rigid Method | • Published in the Clinical Nutrition Open Science Journal. |
| • New Prism Labs 3D reconstruction method more precise than multi-camera 3D scanners. | |
| (2020) Validation of 3 Commercial Body Scanners vs Prism Gen 1 Scanner | • Published in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. |
| • Precise anthropometric estimates were found. | |
| (2019) Accuracy & Precision of Prism Gen 1 Scanner | • Published in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. |
| • Good correlations between tape vs anthropometric measurements and bf% vs DXA were found, with no significant bias. |